Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKusan, Steven
dc.date.accessioned3/24/2014 15:04
dc.date.available3/24/2014 15:04
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn2158-2440
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12799/2474
dc.descriptionSAGE Open, Vol. 3, No. 4es_ES
dc.description.abstractThis article presents results from an exploratory study of what college students from northern Ontario think about and do to manage their mental health. Data gathered in semistructured interviews were analyzed using the constant comparative method. The purpose of the study is to advance our understanding of the ontogeny, substantive nature and deployment of mental health literacy (MHL). MHL has hitherto been defined as “knowledge and beliefs about mental disorders that aid their recognition, management or prevention.”. This definition effectively translates to knowledge of the contents of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, currently in its fifth edition. Results of the study suggest that the current definition of MHL is overly narrow, that individuals use knowledge of various types from various sources to manage their mental health, and that the literacies that inform mental health management practices are developed through iterative engagement in autologous knowledge-translation, at the core of which are cultured resonance, meaning-making, metacognitive evaluation, and heuristic experimentation. MHL is redefined as the self-generated and acquired knowledge with which people negotiate their mental health. Broadening the definition of MHL has potential to enhance the capacity of individuals and communities to manage mental health effectively.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherSAGEes_ES
dc.subjectEducación sanitariaes_ES
dc.subjectSalud mentales_ES
dc.titleDialectics of Mind, Body, and Place : Groundwork for a Theory of Mental Health Literacyes_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record