Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSinharay, Sandip
dc.contributor.authorHaberman, Shelby J.
dc.date.accessioned8/12/2014 15:06
dc.date.available8/12/2014 15:06
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn1745-3992
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12799/3084
dc.descriptionEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 23-35es_ES
dc.description.abstractStandard 3.9 of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (1999) demands evidence of model fit when item response theory (IRT) models are employed to data from tests. Hambleton and Han (2005) and Sinharay (2005) recommended the assessment of practical significance of misfit of IRT models, but few examples of such assessment can be found in the literature concerning IRT model fit. In this article, practical significance of misfit of IRT models was assessed using data from several tests that employ IRT models to report scores. The IRT model did not fit any data set considered in this article. However, the extent of practical significance of misfit varied over the data sets.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherNational Council on Measurement in Educationes_ES
dc.subjectTeoría de respuesta al ítemes_ES
dc.subjectAnálisis de datoses_ES
dc.titleHow Often Is the Misfit of Item Response Theory Models Practically Significant?es_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record