Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTorres, Rosa María
dc.date.accessioned3/7/2016 14:38
dc.date.available3/7/2016 14:38
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12799/4128
dc.descriptionThis paper was widely circulated for comments, and discussed at a number of meetings held between March and September 1999. The initial version was presented at the international seminar "Primary Education at the End of the Decade: Curriculum Policies in Peru and Andean Countries" organized by TAREA in Lima on 3-6 March. An expanded version was presented at the Annual Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society-CIES (Toronto, 14-18 April), at the "Nine Years After Jomtien" panel sponsored by CIDA. Also, I was invited to discuss the paper in Chile, at the Ministry of Education (Santiago, 17 June), Mexico ("First Forum for the Analysis and Monitoring of Education for All" organised by Ayuda en Acción-México, CESDER and FAI-Centro in Zautla, Puebla, 11-12 August), and Colombia (Regional Seminar for Education Focal Points convened by the UNICEF Regional Office, Bogota, 23-27 August). The paper was also discussed at an internal seminar at IIEP UNESCO Buenos Aires.es_ES
dc.description.abstractEducation for All helped revitalize an education reform movement that started well before 1990 in several developing countries. Developments since 1990 are neither uniform nor linear. Major progress has been made on some fronts, whereas stagnation or even deterioration is manifest on others. Of course, there are significant differences between regions and countries, and within each country. New problems have emerged from new solutions. The situation is not clear-cut; achievements are unstable and vulnerable. It is thus more appropriate to speak of trends, tensions, dilemmas, contradictions and future challenges rather than of successes and failures, achievements and setbacks. It is too early to gauge the efficiency of the EFA initiative in terms of the goals set. Even if the results of the decade assessment (the 18 indicators) will be available in the year 20005 , the real impact will only become apparent in a few years, not only due to the traditional delay of educational statistics (and to the quantitative and qualitative aspects these 18 indicators will not be able to cover), but also because of the time taken to perceive and process changes in the education field. However, analyses and assessments performed to date enable us to identify certain trends and draw some general conclusions, more in terms of qualitative aspects and processes, rather than quantitative results. This paper does not intend to evaluate the adherence to quantitative goals set within the scope of EFA. It approaches Education for All as a concept and a strategy, rather than as a goal in itself. More specifically, it focuses on analyzing if, and to what extent, the renewed vision of education, educational policy and international cooperation in education that was outlined in Jomtien, has been achieved. Indeed, the "expanded vision of basic education" was inseparable from attaining the goals set.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherIIPEes_ES
dc.subjectReforma de la educaciónes_ES
dc.subjectOrganización internacionales_ES
dc.subjectAcceso a la educaciónes_ES
dc.subjectEducación universales_ES
dc.subjectRendimiento escolares_ES
dc.subjectEducación primariaes_ES
dc.subjectAmbiente educacionales_ES
dc.titleOne decade of Education for All : The challenge aheades_ES
dc.typeBookes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record