Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCalvert, John
dc.date.accessioned7/15/2014 10:32
dc.date.available7/15/2014 10:32
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn1467-9752
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12799/2921
dc.descriptionJournal of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 69–85es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe basic principle of educational equality is that each child should receive an equally good education. This sounds appealing, but is rather vague and needs substantial working out. Also, educational equality faces all the objections to equality per se, plus others specific to its subject matter. Together these have eroded confidence in the viability of equality as an educational ideal. This article argues that equality of educational opportunity is not the best way of understanding educational equality. It focuses on Brighouse and Swift's well worked out meritocratic conception and finds it irretrievably flawed; they should, instead, have pursued a radical conception they only mention. This conception is used as a starting point for developing a luck egalitarian conception, pluralistic and complex in nature. It is argued that such a conception accounts for the appeal of equality of opportunity, fits with other values in education and meets many of the objections. Thus, equality is reasserted as what morally matters most in education.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonses_ES
dc.subjectIgualdad de oportunidadeses_ES
dc.subjectAcceso a la educaciónes_ES
dc.titleEducational Equality : Luck Egalitarian, Pluralist and Complexes_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record