Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKlassen, Robert M.
dc.contributor.authorKrawchuk, Lindsey L.
dc.date.accessioned7/16/2014 11:37
dc.date.available7/16/2014 11:37
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.issn0361-476X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12799/2959
dc.descriptionContemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 915–931es_ES
dc.description.abstractThis article reports two studies exploring the academic procrastination of 456 undergraduates. Study 1 explores the relationships among academic procrastination, self-regulation, academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, and self-efficacy for self-regulation. Results reveal that although other self-variables are related to procrastination, self-efficacy for self-regulation is most predictive of procrastination tendencies. Study 2 examines academic and motivation characteristics of “negative procrastinators,” the undergraduates who are most adversely influenced by procrastination. The 25% of 195 participants in Study 2 who were classified as negative procrastinators had significantly lower GPAs, higher levels of daily and task procrastination, lower predicted and actual class grades, and lower self-efficacy for self-regulation. After controlling for GPA, daily procrastination and self-efficacy for self-regulation significantly predicted the negative impact of procrastination. The article concludes with a discussion of the importance that self-efficacy for self-regulation holds for procrastination research, and with suggestions for practitioners who work with students who are adversely affected by procrastination.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.subjectMotivaciónes_ES
dc.subjectAutoevaluaciónes_ES
dc.subjectEstudiante universitarioes_ES
dc.titleAcademic procrastination of undergraduates : Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastinationes_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record